Hearing on challenge to ending cash bail in Illinois delayed after amendments – WSIL TV


(The Center Square) – After lawmakers approved amendments to the SAFE-T Act that eliminates cash bail in Illinois, a lawsuit challenging the measure’s implementation will now be heard Dec. 20, just 11 days before no cash bail is to take effect.

Before leaving for the year, state lawmakers approved amendments to the sweeping criminal justice reform legislation that abolishes cash bail starting Jan. 1. The amendments add a slew of serious crimes people can be held for pending trial.

State Rep. Justin Slaughter, D-Chicago, explained one change state’s attorneys sought to pretrial release was what to do with defendants being held before cash bail is abolished Jan. 1.

“There certainly will not be any sort of purge-like event, in fact, quite the opposite,” Slaughter said. “We’re providing a very fair, legal process and protocol for the court system to handle this.”

State Rep. Patrick Windhorst, R-Metropolis, raised a litany of concerns, saying the measure will still make communities less safe. He also said there are legal hurdles.

Illinois state Rep. Patrick Windhorst, R-Metropolis 

Greg Bishop / The Center Square

“The [Illinois Constitution] envisions a cash bail system under Article 1, section 9,” Windhorst said. “We should let the court rule on that provision before we start to do anything with implementing this act. That’s the responsible thing to do.”

The Illinois Constitution states “All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties …,” but does not include any monetary constraints. Cash bail has traditionally been one surety option.

The SAFE-T Act redefines bail, raising questions about if not cash, what is sufficient surety for someone to satisfy the court’s terms for pretrial release.

Sources tell The Center Square the lawsuit dozens of state’s attorneys and sheriffs from both political parties have filed against the measure’s implementation continues. It’s now expected to be heard Dec. 20 in Kankakee County, instead of Wednesday as was previously scheduled.

Amended briefs are due at the end of the week. A ruling is expected Dec. 28, just three days before no cash bail goes into effect.

Despite the amendments lawmakers approved, still at play in the challenge are the single subject rule pertaining to legislation being passed touching on more than one subject and the separation of powers argument where the legislative branch is encroaching on the judicial branch.

Slaughter addressed other changes lawmakers approved to the SAFE-T Act that don’t deal with cash bail. One concerns trespassing.

“In cases where the individual is not posing a threat, we’re requiring that officers do submit a citation before the arrest,” Slaughter said.

Another change deals with who will be required to wear police body cameras to exclude supervisors or administrators.

It’s “not intended to apply to administrative personnel and others not engaging in law enforcement encounters or activities,” Slaughter said.

The amendments have yet to be sent to the governor’s desk for his signature.

Ino Saves New

via rk2’s favorite articles on Inoreader https://ift.tt/Qiw8qHX

December 5, 2022 at 06:11PM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s