Anti-protest energy bill stalls in Senate

By Ted Cox

Environmentalists are cheering a victory over a bill that would have subjected energy protesters to being charged with felonies.

The measure, House Bill 1633, cleared the House of Representatives by a vote of 77-28, over the opposition of the Progressive Caucus, but it was tabled Wednesday in the Senate by sponsor Sen. Michael Hastings of Tinley Park.

Hastings told Rich Miler’s Capitol Fax that he blamed the defeat on “the limited amount of time left in the legislative session” before Friday to make final amendments he wanted to introduce, but he said he’d continue on and “bring all interested parties together over the summer.”

Environmentalists declared victory and vowed to fight on against a bill they blamed on the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council. Greenpeace USA Executive Director Annie Leonard issued a statement calling the bill “a completely unnecessary attempt by the fossil-fuel industry and secretive groups like ALEC to divide the progressive movement at the exact moment when we most need to mobilize quickly toward real solutions to climate change.”

The original bill “creates the offense of criminal damage to a critical infrastructure facility for a person who knowingly damages, destroys, vandalizes, defaces, or tampers with equipment in a critical infrastructure facility,” and expands the definition of such a facility from nuclear plants to “coal mines and any mining operation,” among other loosely defined areas. Violations were to be considered a felony punishable by a $100,000 fine, imprisonment, or both. The original bill also would have held organizations responsible for the actions of their members or associated protesters, with the possibility they could be charged with conspiracy. Some of those provisions were amended in the House version, but Hastings didn’t feel he had the time to rectify language he thought essential ahead of Friday’s midnight deadline to end the current legislative session in the General Assembly.

According to Leonard, more than 50 civil-rights organizations, labor unions, and grassroots groups worked together to defeat this bill, and about 6,000 witness slips were submitted opposing the bill, “compared to a paltry 215 by the bill’s proponents.”

Tabitha Tripp of Southern Illinoisans Against Fracturing Our Environment cheered the victory, but warned, “It’ll be back, stay vigilant.”

Leonard credited Hastings, saying he “did the right thing by tabling HB1633, not just for the state, but as an example that shows that we the people need a healthy democracy to protect our planet.”

Jack Darin, director of the Sierra Club Illinois Chapter, had lobbied against the bill, saying, “The possibility that people are going to go to prison for being on the wrong side of the property line” would create “a chilling effect on free speech, on peaceful protest.”

Elizabeth Kosuth, a Bloomington resident and member of Illinois People’s Action, said the bill was misnamed in an attempt to slip it through the General Assembly. “This bill is called the Critical Infrastructure Bill,” she said. “But it really should be called the Protect Big Energy From the People Bill.”

Opponents emphasized that the bill created no new crimes, but stiffened penalties and fines in what they called an attempt to stifle free speech and the right to protest.


via 1IL

May 30, 2019 at 10:10AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s